Case 1800111/2022 · Employment Tribunal
In Person For the v Ms M Elliott (Director) — 2022
- Case reference
- 1800111/2022
- Decision date
- 10 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Panel members
- Mrs L J Anderson-Coe, Mr M Taj
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In Person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs Clare Wilson, a Care Co-ordinator, brought claims of unfair dismissal, wrongful dismissal in breach of contract, and holiday pay against Prelle Healthcare Ltd. The tribunal found that she was not dismissed either expressly or constructively within section 95(1) ERA 1996. It held that the effective date of termination was 15 November 2021 because she resigned, and the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed.
Applying Western Excavating, Sothern, Kwik-Fit, Willoughby, Kaur and Omilaju, the tribunal found that the matters relied on by the claimant were not repudiatory breaches of the implied term of trust and confidence. It found that Ms Elliott had taken back the on-call phone after the claimant raised concerns, that the October 2021 draft contract involved only cosmetic changes to the job description and title, that the 6 November 2021 advert was for an additional Care Co-ordinator post rather than the claimant's existing role, and that the comments made at the 15 November 2021 meeting did not amount to dismissal. The tribunal also found that the claimant had already decided to resign before that meeting.
The wrongful dismissal claim succeeded because, although the claimant was prepared to give notice and/or work it, the respondent did not allow her to do so and did not pay in lieu of notice. The tribunal awarded damages of £1,240.80, calculated as three weeks at £413.60 per week. The holiday pay claim was dismissed because the claimant did not prove accrual or entitlement, and the tribunal accepted the respondent's evidence that any small remaining entitlement was extinguished by an overpayment of two days' holiday.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was not dismissed expressly or constructively and that she resigned on 15 November 2021. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal found the respondent should have allowed the claimant to work notice or paid in lieu, and awarded three weeks' notice pay at £413.60 per week. | Upheld | — | £1,241 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the holiday pay claim was not proved; it accepted the respondent's evidence that any small remaining entitlement was extinguished by an overpayment of two days. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,241
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
9 references- section 95(1)(c) ERA 1996
- Western Excavating (ECC) v Sharp
- Sothern v Franks Charlesly & Co
- Kwik-Fit Ltd v Lineham
- Willoughby v CF Capital
- Kaur v Leeds Teaching Hospital NHS Trust
- Omilaju v Waltham Forest
- section 98 ERA 1996
- Article 3 of the Employment Tribunals (Extension) Order 1999
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.