Mrs D Young v Trionyx SOS Limited — 2020

Case reference: 1800131/2020
Decision date: 14 February 2020
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Robertson

Indexed: 21 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mrs D Young

Respondent

Trionyx SOS Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

This was a Rule 21 judgment in favour of Mrs D Young against Trionyx SOS Limited. The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered the respondent to pay the net sum of £8,136.18. The hearing listed on 5 March 2020 was cancelled.

The tribunal also ordered the respondent to pay damages for breach of contract in the sum of £694.41. The judgment states that this sum comprised £226.41 for expenses and £468.00 for loan repayment. The total monetary award recorded by the judgment is £8,830.59.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unlawful deduction from wages	The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of the net sum of £8,136.18.	Upheld	—	£8,136
Breach of contract	Damages were awarded for breach of contract in respect of expenses (£226.41) and loan repayment (£468.00).	Upheld	—	£694

Remedy

Monetary award

Total award: £8,831; across all upheld claims

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.