Case 1800168/2021 · Employment Tribunal
In Person v Gane Datascan Ltd (in creditors voluntary liquidation) — 2021
- Case reference
- 1800168/2021
- Decision date
- 26 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wedderspoon Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In Person
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Leeds by CVP on 25 March 2021 before Employment Judge Wedderspoon, recorded that the claimant, Mr S. Sattari, appeared in person and that there was no attendance for the respondent, Gane Datascan Limited. In a brief judgment, the tribunal awarded the claimant £6,371.54 for unpaid overtime.
The written record does not include separate reasons beyond the note that reasons were given orally at the hearing. It therefore does not set out findings on liability in any greater detail, and it does not identify any split between different heads of loss or any additional remedy component.
The judgment is limited to the monetary award for unpaid overtime and records that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the sending of the written record of the decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment records an award of £6,371.54 for unpaid overtime. It does not set out the legal basis in more detail; the claim type is inferred from the GOV.UK listing and the nature of the award. | Upheld | — | £6,372 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,372
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.