Case 1800202/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Inhus Engineering Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1800202/2020
- Decision date
- 14 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment after the respondent had been served at its registered office, was shown as active at Companies House, and did not present a response within the relevant time limits. The claimant, Mr M Hensel, succeeded on both pleaded money claims. The tribunal found that the complaint of unlawful deductions from wages succeeded in respect of arrears, described as three weeks' wages recorded on pay slips as having been paid but not actually paid, and awarded the net sum of £1,565.96.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal awarded the net sum of £1,565.96 for arrears of wages described as three weeks' wages recorded on pay slips as having been paid but not paid. | Upheld | — | £1,566 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal awarded the gross sum of £648 for failure to pay holiday pay on termination. | Upheld | — | £648 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,214
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.