Claimant v Inhus Engineering Ltd — 2020

Case reference: 1800202/2020
Decision date: 14 April 2020
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge JM Wade

Indexed: 22 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Respondent

Inhus Engineering Ltd

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

This was a Rule 21 judgment after the respondent had been served at its registered office, was shown as active at Companies House, and did not present a response within the relevant time limits. The claimant, Mr M Hensel, succeeded on both pleaded money claims. The tribunal found that the complaint of unlawful deductions from wages succeeded in respect of arrears, described as three weeks' wages recorded on pay slips as having been paid but not actually paid, and awarded the net sum of £1,565.96.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unlawful deduction from wages	The tribunal awarded the net sum of £1,565.96 for arrears of wages described as three weeks' wages recorded on pay slips as having been paid but not paid.	Upheld	—	£1,566
Holiday pay	The tribunal awarded the gross sum of £648 for failure to pay holiday pay on termination.	Upheld	—	£648

Remedy

Monetary award

Total award: £2,214; across all upheld claims

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.