Case 1800222/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Thompson v Omnia Protect Ltd Heard on 29 March 2022 via CVP — 2022
- Case reference
- 1800222/2022
- Decision date
- 29 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shepherd Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Thompson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Ms S Thompson, succeeded in her claims for unauthorised deduction from wages, notice pay, and outstanding holiday pay. The tribunal ordered Omnia Protect Ltd to pay £9,222.04 net for unauthorised deduction from wages, £2,305.51 net for notice pay, and £2,853.80 net for outstanding holiday pay.
The respondent did not appear at the hearing, which was held on 29 March 2022 via CVP before Employment Judge Shepherd. The judgment records the sums awarded but does not set out any detailed findings beyond the tribunal’s acceptance of those financial claims.
Any claim for a redundancy payment was dismissed because the claimant had insufficient continuity of service to bring such a claim. The judgment therefore records full success on the wages, notice pay, and holiday pay claims, and dismissal of the redundancy payment claim.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £9,222 |
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £2,306 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £2,854 |
| Redundancy | Dismissed because the claimant had insufficient continuity of service to bring a redundancy payment claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £14,381
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.