Case 1800237/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M. Pacey v EC Outsourcing Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1800237/2021
- Decision date
- 26 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T.R. Smith
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M. Pacey
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Leeds on 26 March 2021, Employment Judge T.R. Smith recorded that neither the claimant nor the respondent attended. The judgment states that Mr M. Pacey's claim against EC Outsourcing Ltd was dismissed.
The extracted text does not set out separate reasons for the dismissal, does not break down the individual heads of claim, and does not record any monetary award or other remedy.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The gov.uk listing identifies a disability discrimination claim; the extracted judgment text itself only records that the claim was dismissed and gives no further reasoning or separate disposal for this head. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The gov.uk listing identifies an unlawful deduction from wages claim; the extracted judgment text itself only records that the claim was dismissed and gives no further reasoning or separate disposal for this head. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.