Case 1800238/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v LK Leisure Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1800238/2022
- Decision date
- 26 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented to the respondent’s registered office and by email to its director, but no response was filed by the return dates. On 21 March 2022 the claimant withdrew claims relating to dividend payments, which the tribunal noted were outside its jurisdiction.
The tribunal issued a rule 21 judgment on the material claims. It upheld the claimant’s complaints of unlawful deductions from wages and unpaid holiday pay, and ordered the respondent to pay the gross sums of £476.37 for arrears of pay and £812.39 for holiday pay.
The tribunal did not give a dismissal judgment in relation to the withdrawn dividend-related claims, because they may be pursued in a different jurisdiction. The total sum awarded on the upheld claims was £1,288.76.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claim for arrears of pay succeeded and ordered payment of the gross sum of £476.37. | Upheld | — | £476 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the claim for unpaid holiday pay succeeded and ordered payment of the gross sum of £812.39. | Upheld | — | £812 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,289
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.