Case 1800243/2000 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Goodsell v Styrene Packaging and Insulation Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1800243/2000
- Decision date
- 8 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Maidment Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Goodsell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that terms of settlement had been agreed in principle between Mr C Goodsell and Styrene Packaging and Insulation Limited. It stayed the proceedings until 22 October 2020 so that the settlement terms could be formalised.
The order gave the parties liberty to apply to restore the proceedings by that date. If no such application was made, the claimant's complaints were to be dismissed without the need for any further application, order or judgment. The judgment did not record a final merits determination, liability finding, or monetary award on 8 October 2020.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that terms of settlement had been agreed in principle and the proceedings were stayed to allow those terms to be formalised. It did not record a final merits determination on this date. | Settled | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment records that terms of settlement had been agreed in principle and the proceedings were stayed to allow those terms to be formalised. It did not record a final merits determination on this date. | Settled | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.