Case 1800264/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Brown v National Highways Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1800264/2022
- Decision date
- 20 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge H Bright Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Brown
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Leeds Employment Tribunals on 27 January 2022. The respondent presented a response stating that it did not contest the claim, and the Employment Judge decided that the claim could properly be determined under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal held that the complaint of unfair dismissal succeeded and was upheld. It ordered the respondent to pay £2,448 as an unfair dismissal basic award and awarded £500 as compensation for loss of statutory rights. The listed hearing on 20, 21 and 22 September 2022 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment awards £2,448 as the unfair dismissal basic award and £500 as compensation for loss of statutory rights; it does not expressly label the £500 as part of a compensatory award. | Upheld | — | £2,948 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,948
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £2,448
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £500
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.