Case 1800293/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Cherry v Commstock Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1800293/2019
- Decision date
- 5 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shepherd Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Cherry
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr M Cherry brought a claim against Commstock Ltd that was heard by Employment Judge Shepherd at Leeds by video link on 5 May 2021. The tribunal held that the claim of unauthorised deduction from wages succeeded.
The judgment ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £21,000.00 gross. It also stated that the sum was gross and that the claimant was responsible for any tax or national insurance due on it. The extracted text does not record any further reasoning or a split of the award into separate remedy components.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment describes the claim as one for unauthorised deduction from wages and awards a gross sum of £21,000.00. | Upheld | — | £21,000 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £21,000
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.