Case 1800301/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v James Hare Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 1800301/2019
- Decision date
- 24 June 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cox Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that Mr L Burgess did not attend a preliminary hearing for case management on 28 May 2019 and gave no explanation for his absence. Tribunal staff attempted to contact him by leaving a voicemail to confirm that the hearing was about to start, but he did not respond.
The tribunal then issued an order telling the claimant that it was proposing to strike out the claim on the ground that it had not been actively pursued. He was directed to provide any comments in response, or to request a hearing to make them, by 11 June 2019. He did not respond to that order or contact the tribunal.
The tribunal was satisfied that the claimant had not actively pursued the claim and that it was appropriate to strike it out under Rule 37 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure. The judgment does not record any monetary award or other remedy. The decision is dated 24 June 2019 and was signed by Employment Judge Cox.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying claim type in the extracted text. The claim was struck out under Rule 37 because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 37 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.