Case 1800319/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Stimson v Crouch Logistics Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1800319/2022
- Decision date
- 15 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Maidment Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Stimson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Leeds Employment Tribunals on 1 February 2022. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge Maidment determined the matter under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
On the material before the tribunal, the respondent was found to have made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages. The judgment ordered the respondent, Crouch Logistics (In Administration), to pay Mr P Stimson £1,238.62 gross.
The judgment also records that the tribunal had no power to make an award in such claims to compensate for stress and that any payment of pension contributions should be referred to the pensions adjudicator.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal found the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £1,238.62 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,239 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,239
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.