Case 1800322/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v City Hearts Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 1800322/2019
- Decision date
- 20 March 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rostant Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Ms S Ghotbi, brought a claim of unfair dismissal against City Hearts Ltd under sections 94 and 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The tribunal dismissed that claim because the claimant did not have sufficient service to bring an unfair dismissal complaint.
The judgment also states, for the avoidance of doubt, that an application to amend to include a claim of automatic unfair dismissal under section 103 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, said to concern public interest disclosure, remained to be determined. No outcome is recorded for that application in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal dismissed the unfair dismissal claim because the claimant did not have sufficient service to pursue it. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.94 and s.98 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.