Case 1800327/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P G Heppenstall v Euro car parts instrmac group Heard by CVP on 6 April 2022 — 2022
- Case reference
- 1800327/2022
- Decision date
- 6 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P G Heppenstall
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard by CVP on 6 April 2022 before Employment Judge D N Jones, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent not attending. The judgment records the case number as 1800327/2022 and gives the respondent name as euro car parts instrmac group.
The Tribunal dismissed the claims. Its reason was jurisdictional: the claims identified in box 8.1 of the claim form, the facts set out in box 8.2, the remedies sought in box 9.2, and the claimant's observations at the hearing about an alleged failure by the respondent to discharge a duty of care did not disclose a legal complaint falling within the Tribunal's jurisdiction. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not specify the pleaded legal claims by name. It states that the claims identified in box 8.1 of the claim form, the facts in box 8.2, the remedies in 9.2, and the claimant's observations at the hearing about a failure of duty of care did not disclose a legal complaint within the Tribunal's jurisdiction. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.