Case 1800347/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Hyder v -v- Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust — 2020
- Case reference
- 1800347/2020
- Decision date
- 12 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Evans Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Hyder
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the Preliminary Hearing on 10 March 2020, the Claimant withdrew his claims of unfair dismissal, unlawful deductions from wages, wrongful dismissal, and holiday pay. The Employment Tribunal’s judgment dated 12 March 2020 records that those claims were dismissed following that withdrawal. The judgment does not record any substantive findings on the merits of the claims and does not award any remedy.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states this claim was dismissed following its withdrawal by the Claimant at the Preliminary Hearing on 10 March 2020. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states this claim was dismissed following its withdrawal by the Claimant at the Preliminary Hearing on 10 March 2020. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The judgment states this claim was dismissed following its withdrawal by the Claimant at the Preliminary Hearing on 10 March 2020. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states this claim was dismissed following its withdrawal by the Claimant at the Preliminary Hearing on 10 March 2020. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.