Case 1800351/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms W Wojtylak v Fibreline Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1800351/2022
- Decision date
- 2 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Miller Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms W Wojtylak
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis reserved judgment determined a preliminary issue under section 6 of the Equality Act 2010: whether Ms W Wojtylak was a disabled person by reason of back pain, and if so from what date. The claim form had included unfair dismissal and disability discrimination, and an earlier case management hearing had identified claims of discrimination arising from disability, failure to make reasonable adjustments, and harassment related to disability, but this hearing was limited to disability status.
The tribunal found that the claimant had ongoing back pain from 24 September 2018. It relied on contemporaneous GP records, musculoskeletal clinic notes, MRI material, occupational health evidence, fit notes, and the claimant's evidence about the effect of the pain on walking, sitting, climbing stairs, driving and brushing her teeth. It accepted that those difficulties were more than minor or trivial and rejected the respondent's submission that there were two separate impairments, finding instead one continual episode of back pain subject to ongoing investigation.
The tribunal also found that the condition did not become long-term until 21 September 2019. It accepted that the prevailing medical view during 2019 was that the problem was likely to be relatively transient and capable of resolution, and held that it was only by January 2020 that it became likely to be long term. The tribunal therefore held that the claimant was disabled by reason of back pain from 21 September 2019 until the termination of her employment. The judgment did not determine liability on the substantive claims and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary issue only: the tribunal held that the claimant was disabled by reason of back pain from 21 September 2019 until the end of her employment. It did not determine the substantive unfair dismissal or disability discrimination claims. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
9 references- s.6 Equality Act 2010
- paragraph 2 of Schedule 1 Equality Act 2010
- Goodwin v the Patent Office [1999] IRLR 4, EAT
- McDougall v Richmond Adult Community College [2008] ICR 431
- EHRC Code of Practice on Employment
- Veitch v Red Sky Group Ltd [2010] NICA 39
- J v DLA Piper UK LLP UK EWAT-0263-09-RM
- Dias da Silva Primaz v Carl Room Restaurants Ltd t/a Mcdonald's Restaurants Ltd [2022] IRLR 194
- Cruickshank v Vaw Motorcast Ltd [2002] IRLR 24
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.