Case 1800362/2022 · Employment Tribunal
In person, assisted by Mr M Reid, lay representative For the v Respondent — 2022
- Case reference
- 1800362/2022
- Decision date
- 19 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge A James Representation
- Venue
- Sheffield
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person, assisted by Mr M Reid, lay representative For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case in Sheffield on 17, 18 and 19 October 2022 before Employment Judge A James. Mr R Thorpe appeared in person, assisted by Mr M Reid, lay representative, and the respondent was represented by Mr G Price, counsel.
The only claim identified in the judgment was unfair dismissal under s.94 Employment Rights Act 1996. The tribunal recorded that the claim was not upheld and was dismissed.
The extracted judgment text does not set out further findings of fact, legal analysis, or any monetary remedy, so the record is limited to the dismissal outcome.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claim for unfair dismissal under s.94 Employment Rights Act 1996 was not upheld and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.94 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.