Case 1800375/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Parrett v Harvard Technology Limited (In Administration) AT A HEARING — 2019
- Case reference
- 1800375/2019
- Decision date
- 17 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lancaster Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Parrett
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that it was not reasonably practicable for the claim to have been presented in time, and that it was presented within a reasonable time after 9 March 2019. Time was therefore extended and the claim was allowed to proceed.
The claim for a protective award succeeded. The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant remuneration for a protected period of 90 days beginning on 10 December 2018.
The tribunal recorded that the Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefit) Regulations 1996, regulations 6, 7 and 8, applied to the award, with payment postponed pending any recoupment notice relating to relevant benefits.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment describes this as a claim for a protective award. No monetary sum is specified; the order is remuneration for a protected period of 90 days beginning on 10 December 2018. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- not reasonably practicable
- Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefit) Regulations 1996 regulations 6, 7 and 8
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.