Case 1800392/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss AM Osenko v Karpaty Bakery Hull Ltd Ms M Rykaczewska PRELIMINARY HEARING Heard: BT Meet Me On: 29 May 2020 — 2020
- Case reference
- 1800392/2020
- Decision date
- 1 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss AM Osenko
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a remote preliminary hearing by BT Meet Me on 29 May 2020 before Employment Judge JM Wade. The parties did not object to the remote format. All parties were litigants in person, and after the issues were explored they agreed to a consent judgment rather than wait for a delayed hearing.
The judgment records that the claimants' unlawful deductions from wages, breach of contract and holiday pay claims succeeded. It states that the net sums unpaid to Miss AM Osenko and Ms M Rykaczewska for work in December and holiday pay were £623.84 and £1,043.00 respectively. It also ordered the respondent to provide the claimants' payslips for their work in December 2019 and holiday pay within 14 days.
The respondent's employer's contract claim also succeeded. The judgment says the damages arising from the claimants' breaches were £291.95 each. After that set-off, the sums payable within 14 days were £331.89 to Miss AM Osenko and £751.05 to Ms M Rykaczewska.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Consent judgment records the claimants' unlawful deductions from wages claim as successful. Paragraph 2 records unpaid net sums of £623.84 for Miss AM Osenko and £1,043.00 for Ms M Rykaczewska for work in December and holiday pay, before set-off. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment also records the claimants' breach of contract claim as successful as part of the combined consent judgment. No separate head-specific allocation was given for this element. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Holiday pay formed part of the successful claim bundle. The judgment records unpaid sums for work in December and holiday pay, but does not split the award by claim head. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The respondent's employer's contract claim succeeded. The judgment records damages arising from the claimants' breaches at £291.95 each, i.e. £583.90 in total. | Upheld | — | £584 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,083
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.