Case 1800392/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Williams v George Wright Boutique Hotel — 2023
- Case reference
- 1800392/2023
- Decision date
- 9 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lancaster
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Williams
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out Mr K Williams's claim against George Wright Boutique Hotel. By letter dated 25 July 2023, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out because he had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 10 May 2023 and because the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Lancaster struck out the claim on 9 August 2023. The judgment does not record any substantive findings on the underlying breach of contract or working time issues, and no monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment does not separate the pleaded heads of claim. The claim was struck out because the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 10 May 2023 and had not actively pursued the case. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment does not separate the pleaded heads of claim. The claim was struck out because the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 10 May 2023 and had not actively pursued the case. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.