Case 1800402/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs E Speight v Ideal Carehomes (Number One) Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 1800402/2024
- Decision date
- 10 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
- Venue
- By CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs E Speight
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing by CVP on 10 June 2024 before Employment Judge JM Wade, the tribunal considered the respondent's application to strike out the claims on time limits and/or merits. The claimant, Mrs E Speight, had less than two years' service in a care role. On the unfair dismissal complaint, the tribunal accepted that there had been an apparent misunderstanding about the end of employment, but found that the dismissal letter was clear enough to make immediate dismissal effective when it was received on 10 August 2023.
On that basis, the tribunal held that the unfair dismissal time limit expired on 9 November 2023, that ACAS early conciliation ran from 19 October 2023 to 30 November 2023, and that the claim had to be presented by 30 December 2023. As the claim was presented on 12 January 2024 and no reason such as illness or another impediment was given for the delay, the tribunal found it was reasonably practicable to present the claim in time and dismissed the unfair dismissal complaint.
The detriment complaint was treated differently. Once it was clarified that the alleged detriment arose on 19 September 2023, the tribunal found there was no time limit problem. It also declined to strike the claim out on merits, saying it could not say the allegation had little or no reasonable prospects of success. The tribunal recorded that the evidential issues, including the reason for refusing a review or appeal hearing with representation and whether the purpose was to deter use of trade union services, would be for the final hearing.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed at the preliminary hearing on limitation grounds. The tribunal found the effective date of termination was 10 August 2023, the claim was presented on 12 January 2024, and it was reasonably practicable to present it in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Trade union | The tribunal found there was no time limit issue once the relevant event was clarified as 19 September 2023, and it did not strike out the claim on merits. It said it could not conclude the allegation had little or no reasonable prospects of success, so the complaint was to continue to final hearing unless otherwise disposed. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- reasonably practicable
- little or no reasonable prospects of success
- sole or main purpose
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.