Case 1800405/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In person/Mrs Peake (sister) v Respondent — 2021
- Case reference
- 1800405/2020
- Decision date
- 9 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
- Panel members
- Mrs L Anderson-Coe, Mr K Lannaman
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person/Mrs Peake (sister)
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal upheld the claimant’s complaint of a failure to make reasonable adjustments in respect of events on 27 May 2019. It rejected her other allegations of contraventions of the Equality Act 2010.
The judgment records that no recommendations were made because the recommendations sought by the claimant had been overtaken by events. The tribunal awarded £4,000 for injury to feelings and £596.92 interest, calculated on 97 weeks at 8%.
The tribunal directed that the awards for injury to feelings and interest were not to be subject to deductions for tax or national insurance. Written reasons for the finding at paragraph 1 were to be provided separately when resources permitted.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The complaint succeeded only in respect of a failure to make reasonable adjustments arising from events on 27 May 2019. The judgment states that, in other respects, the allegations of contraventions of the Equality Act did not succeed. | Upheld | Disability | £4,000 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,597
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.