Case 1800407/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Felix Viegas v Simon Thompson and 6 others — 2024
- Case reference
- 1800407/2024
- Decision date
- 1 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Housego Representation
Parties
8 namedClaimant
Felix Viegas
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant was dismissed on 31 August 2023. The tribunal found that the three-month period for presenting an unfair dismissal claim ended on 29 November 2023. The claimant began Acas early conciliation on 30 November 2023, after the primary limitation period had expired, so the Acas provisions did not extend time. The claim was presented on 13 January 2024.
The claimant argued that it had not been reasonably practicable to present the claim in time because of mental health issues, difficulties navigating the process, loss of union support, inability to obtain representation, alleged errors in the Acas notification and ET1, and eviction and debt issues. The tribunal found that there was insufficient medical or other evidence to show that mental health issues made it not reasonably practicable to file the claim in time, and that the other matters relied on did not meet that test.
The tribunal found on the balance of probabilities that the claimant had not shown that it was not reasonably practicable to file within the limitation period, so the claim had to be struck out. The tribunal also stated that, even if the first stage had been satisfied, the claim would still have been dismissed because filing almost a month after the Acas certificate was issued was not within such further period as was reasonable.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states the claim was solely a claim of unfair dismissal, with public interest disclosure referred to in the context of that unfair dismissal claim. The claim was struck out as out of time. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
7 references- Employment Rights Act 1996 s.111
- Employment Rights Act 1996 s.207B
- not reasonably practicable
- balance of probabilities
- Paczkowski v Sieradzka
- DHL Supply Chain Ltd v Fazackerley
- Dedman v British Building and Engineering Appliances Ltd
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.