Case 1800424/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss M Taskova v GXO Logistics UK Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1800424/2020
- Decision date
- 21 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Miller Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss M Taskova
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal refused the claimant's application dated 24 January 2022 to strike out the respondent's response.
The tribunal recorded that the respondent appeared to have attempted to deliver the bundle in accordance with case management orders and to the claimant's preferred addresses on a number of occasions. It also appeared that the claimant had received a copy of the bundle, because the respondent referred to the claimant's witness evidence.
The tribunal found that it was not in the interests of justice to strike out the response. It noted that, if the claimant continued to assert that documents were missing or that the respondent had acted unreasonably in its conduct of the case, she could raise those issues at the final hearing in questions to the respondent's witnesses or in submissions as necessary.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment concerns the claimant's application dated 24 January 2022 to strike out the respondent's response, which was refused. It does not adjudicate the substantive discrimination claims indicated by the listing categories. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.