Case 1800436/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G E Andrews v S J Dannatt Logistics Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1800436/2023
- Decision date
- 18 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge K Armstrong Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G E Andrews
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing in Leeds on 17 April 2023 before Employment Judge K Armstrong, the tribunal ordered S J Dannatt Logistics Ltd to pay Mr G E Andrews a redundancy payment of £3,426, notice pay of £4,320 gross, and £576 gross in respect of annual leave accrued but untaken at the termination of his employment.
The published record is a short rule 61 judgment. It records that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing, and that written reasons will not be provided unless requested within 14 days, so the public decision does not set out the tribunal's factual or legal reasoning beyond the awards made.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The published record orders payment of a redundancy payment in this sum. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, and no written reasons are provided in the public judgment. | Upheld | — | £3,426 |
| Breach of contract | The published record orders payment of notice pay in this gross sum. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, and no written reasons are provided in the public judgment. | Upheld | — | £4,320 |
| Holiday pay | The published record orders payment of accrued but untaken annual leave at termination in this gross sum. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, and no written reasons are provided in the public judgment. | Upheld | — | £576 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,322
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.