Case 1800463/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Christopher Rigg v Age Partnership Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1800463/2023
- Decision date
- 2 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Watson REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Christopher Rigg
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Leeds Employment Tribunal on 2 May 2023 before Employment Judge Watson. Mr Christopher Rigg appeared in person and Age Partnership Ltd was represented by a HR consultant. The tribunal recorded that reasons had been given orally at the hearing, with no written reasons provided unless requested within 14 days.
The tribunal found that the respondent breached the claimant's contract of employment by failing to pay him the bonus to which he was entitled. It awarded damages for that breach in the sum of £5,000, described in the judgment as the amount by which he was underpaid.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found that the respondent breached the claimant's contract of employment by failing to pay the bonus to which he was entitled. | Upheld | — | £5,000 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,000
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £5,000
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.