Case 1800474/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J Miller v A Marketing Vocation Limited AT A HEARING — 2023
- Case reference
- 1800474/2023
- Decision date
- 18 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lancaster Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss J Miller
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing in Leeds on 18 April 2023 before Employment Judge Lancaster, with the Claimant appearing in person and the Respondent not attending, the tribunal found that A Marketing Vocation Limited had made unauthorised deductions from Miss J Miller's wages. The deductions related to monthly bonuses for November and December 2022. The tribunal accepted that the Claimant had met the criteria in place at the material times and that the bonus was payable in arrears later in the same month as wage payments were due.
The tribunal ordered the Respondent to pay £898 gross in respect of those unlawful deductions. It also found that the Respondent had failed to give the Claimant a written statement of particulars of employment that met the requirements of Part 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. For that failure, the tribunal made an additional award under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002, calculated as the equivalent of two weeks' pay and stated as £410.76.
The total award recorded in the judgment was £1,308.76. The judgment notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages because the Respondent did not pay monthly bonuses for November and December 2022, although the Claimant had met the qualifying criteria at the material times. | Upheld | — | £898 |
| Other | The tribunal found that the Respondent failed to provide a written statement of particulars of employment satisfying Part 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and made an additional award of compensation equivalent to two weeks' pay under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002. | Upheld | — | £411 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,309
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Part 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 38 of the Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.