Case 1800483/2024 · Employment Tribunal

(1) Mr R Trigg (2) Mr F Wade (3) Miss M Hastings (4) Miss N Sutton (5) Mrs K Collier (6) Mr P Haigh (7) Mr J Pickles (8) Mrs E Harriott (9) Mr D Emery v SSB Group (in administration) and 1 other — 2024

Case reference: 1800483/2024
Decision date: 17 June 2024
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Lancaster Representation
Venue: Leeds

Indexed: 21 May 2026

Parties

3 named

Claimant

(1) Mr R Trigg (2) Mr F Wade (3) Miss M Hastings (4) Miss N Sutton (5) Mrs K Collier (6) Mr P Haigh (7) Mr J Pickles (8) Mrs E Harriott (9) Mr D Emery

Respondents

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

At a preliminary hearing on 17 June 2024, the tribunal found that the named claimants were within a group of more than 20 employees employed at Navigation House, 1 South Quay Drive, Sheffield, or the immediately adjacent building, and that they were made redundant within a 90-day period starting with the first redundancy on 29 November 2023. The tribunal accepted the evidence that there had been no consultation before the affected employees were dismissed as redundant.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Trade union	Protective award claim under section 188 TULRCA 1992. The tribunal found a failure to elect or consult appropriate employee representatives and made a protective award for 90 days beginning on 29 November 2023. No monetary amount is stated in the extracted text.	Upheld	—	—

Legal tests applied

3 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.