Case 1800485/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Mealing v Persimmon Homes Ltd and 2 others — 2019
- Case reference
- 1800485/2019
- Decision date
- 5 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey Claimant
- Venue
- Bristol
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Miss A Mealing
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 21 November 2019 at Bristol before Employment Judge Livesey sitting alone, the tribunal recorded that Miss A Mealing was disabled at the material time, 25 May to 11 September 2018, by reason of ADHD and/or UCTD. The written record does not set out the full substantive list of complaints, but it does record that the disability issue was resolved for that period.
The tribunal also recorded that the claim against the First Respondent was dismissed upon withdrawal. It stated that the claim proceeded in accordance with the Case Management Summary and Order of the same date. No liability finding beyond the disability-status determination and no remedy figure is recorded in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal recorded that the claimant was disabled at the material time, 25 May to 11 September 2018, by virtue of ADHD and/or UCTD. The claim against the First Respondent was dismissed upon withdrawal, and the record does not set out any merits finding beyond that preliminary disability determination. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.