Case 1800490/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Bryson v PDA (Hull) Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1800490/2020
- Decision date
- 25 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wedderspoon Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Bryson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal issued a rule 37 strike out judgment in Mr A Bryson v PDA (Hull) Ltd. It recorded that by letter dated 8 June 2020 the claimant was given an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the tribunal struck out the claim. No remedy was awarded or assessed in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37 after giving the claimant an opportunity by letter dated 8 June 2020 to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out for not being actively pursued. The claimant did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.