Case 1800492/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr W Mack v Chemence Graphics UK Limited (in administration) — 2020
- Case reference
- 1800492/2020
- Decision date
- 28 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Maidment Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr W Mack
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment against Chemence Graphics UK Limited (in administration). Employment Judge Maidment recorded that the respondent had failed to comply with section 188 and section 188A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992.
The Tribunal therefore made a protective award. The award required the respondent to pay remuneration to Mr W Mack, who had been dismissed as redundant on 23 October 2019, for a period of 90 days beginning on that date.
The extracted judgment does not state any separate monetary figure for the award, so no cash total can be extracted from the text provided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | Rule 21 judgment. The Tribunal found the respondent had failed to comply with section 188 and section 188A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 and made a protective award. The award was for remuneration to the claimant for a period of 90 days beginning on 23 October 2019, when he was dismissed as redundant. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.188 TULRCA 1992
- s.188A TULRCA 1992
- Rule 21 judgment
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.