Case 1800500/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. Kenneth Ward v Sheffield Health & Social Care Foundation Trust PRELIMINARY HEARING — 2021
- Case reference
- 1800500/2021
- Decision date
- 10 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. Kenneth Ward
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Kenneth Ward brought a race discrimination complaint against Sheffield Health & Social Care Foundation Trust. The tribunal found that the last alleged act of discrimination was 2 September 2020, so the primary limitation period expired on 1 December 2020. The ET1 was presented on 21 January 2021 after ACAS early conciliation, and the claimant accepted that the claim was out of time and sought an extension.
The tribunal found that the delay was caused by the claimant's mistaken belief that he had one month from when he personally received the ACAS certificate. It accepted that he had been represented by Unison during the relevant period, had access to advice, had also consulted a solicitor, and was not prevented by ill health or by any act of the respondent from issuing the claim in time. The tribunal treated the ACAS guidance as turning on deemed receipt and concluded that the claimant's reliance on a later personal receipt date was unreasonable.
Applying s.123 EqA 2010 and the authorities cited, including Palmer & Saunders, British Coal v Keeble, Robertson v Bexley Community Centre, Adedeji, Miller v MoJ, and Dedman, the tribunal held that it would not be just and equitable to extend time. The race discrimination complaint was therefore dismissed for want of jurisdiction, with no remedy awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Dismissed as out of time under s.123 EqA 2010; the tribunal held it was not just and equitable to extend time and therefore had no jurisdiction. The reasons contain an apparent typo at para 2.6 referring to an ACAS certificate dated 12 December 2021, but the surrounding chronology indicates 12 December 2020. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
7 references- s.123(1)(b) EqA 2010 just and equitable extension
- Palmer & Saunders v Southend BC
- British Coal v Keeble
- Robertson v Bexley Community Centre
- Adedeji v University of Birmingham Hospitals FT
- Miller v MoJ
- Dedman v British Building & Engineering Appliances Ltd
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.