Case 1800508/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Batty v SCH Services Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1800508/2023
- Decision date
- 15 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lancaster Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Batty
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal dealt only with the unfair dismissal complaint in this judgment. It recorded that, by letter dated 20 April 2023, the claimant was given an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the complaint should not be struck out for want of jurisdiction.
The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the Tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal complaint. The judgment also notes that the claimant's remaining claims were still listed for hearing on 5 June 2023, with a reduced time estimate of 2 hours.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The Tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal complaint because it had no jurisdiction to hear it. The claimant was given an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing by letter dated 20 April 2023, but did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.