Mr C Vause v Ladbrokes Coral — 2020

Case reference: 1800513/2020
Decision date: 6 February 2020
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Robertson

Indexed: 20 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr C Vause

Respondent

Ladbrokes Coral

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The judgment is a judgment on withdrawal under rule 52. It records that Mr C Vause was the claimant and Ladbrokes Coral Group Plc was the respondent, and that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant.

No substantive findings on the merits of the contract of employment or unlawful deduction from wages matters are recorded in the judgment text. No remedy or monetary award is recorded.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Breach of contract	The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The claim type is inferred from the gov.uk listing category 'Contract of Employment' rather than from detail in the judgment text itself.	Withdrawn	—	—
Unlawful deduction from wages	The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The claim type is inferred from the gov.uk listing category 'Unlawful Deduction from Wages' rather than from detail in the judgment text itself.	Withdrawn	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.