Case 1800540/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Roberts v Harvard Technology Ltd (In Administration) — 2019
- Case reference
- 1800540/2019
- Decision date
- 11 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lancaster Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Roberts
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal gave judgment under Rule 21. It recorded that Mr Roberts' claim for a protective award against Harvard Technology Ltd (In Administration) succeeded.
The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant remuneration for a protected period of 90 days beginning on 10 December 2018. The judgment also stated that the Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefit) Regulations 1996, regulations 6, 7 and 8, applied, so payment would be postponed pending any recoupment notice and only any balance would be payable directly to the claimant.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment states that the claim for a protective award succeeds and orders remuneration for a protected period of 90 days. The locked taxonomy has no specific protective award category, so this is classified as other rather than redundancy_pay. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 21
- Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefit) Regulations 1996 regulations 6, 7 and 8
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.