Case 1800566/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr H Bower v Jamie Crowther — 2025
- Case reference
- 1800566/2025
- Decision date
- 5 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shepherd Appearances
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr H Bower
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Leeds by CVP video link on 5 September 2025 before Employment Judge Shepherd. The claimant, Mr H Bower, was represented by his mother, Ms S Bower. The respondent, Jamie Crowther, did not appear. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, and the written record notes that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
The tribunal held that the claim of unauthorised deduction from wages was well-founded and ordered the respondent to pay £1,656.25. It also held that the claim for failure to pay outstanding annual leave succeeded and ordered payment of £780.00. The total ordered to be paid to the claimant was £2,436.25.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records the award as '£1.656.25'; this appears to be an OCR/formatting issue and is read with the total award as £1,656.25. | Upheld | — | £1,656 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal described this as a claim for 'failure outstanding annual leave' and ordered payment of £780.00. | Upheld | — | £780 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,436
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.