Case 1800577/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Pugh v Harvard Technology Ltd (In Administration) — 2019
- Case reference
- 1800577/2019
- Decision date
- 11 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lancaster Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Pugh
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal gave a Rule 21 judgment. It stated that the claim for a protective award succeeds against Harvard Technology Ltd (in Administration).
The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant remuneration for a protected period of 90 days beginning on 10 December 2018. The judgment also stated that the Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefit) Regulations 1996 regulations 6, 7 and 8 apply, with payment subject to any relevant recoupment notice and only the balance then payable directly to the claimant.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment states that the claim for a protective award succeeds and orders remuneration for a protected period of 90 days beginning on 10 December 2018. No monetary amount is specified. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 21
- Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefit) Regulations 1996 regulations 6, 7 and 8
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.