Case 1800580/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A Sherridan v Sheffield Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust — 2019
- Case reference
- 1800580/2019
- Decision date
- 25 June 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs A Sherridan
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Leeds on 11 June 2019, Employment Judge T R Smith recorded that Mrs A Sherridan’s claims against Sheffield Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust were withdrawn. The complaints listed in the judgment were direct discrimination under section 13 of the Equality Act 2010, discrimination arising from disability under section 15, indirect discrimination under section 19, failure to make reasonable adjustments under sections 20 and 21, and victimisation under section 27.
The judgment does not set out any substantive findings on liability because the complaints were dismissed on withdrawal. No remedy was assessed or awarded. The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Direct discrimination under section 13 Equality Act 2010; dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Discrimination arising from disability under section 15 Equality Act 2010; dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Indirect discrimination under section 19 Equality Act 2010; dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Failure to make reasonable adjustments under sections 20 and 21 Equality Act 2010; dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Victimisation | Victimisation under section 27 Equality Act 2010; dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.