Case 1800589/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Parry v City of Leeds Trampolining Club Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1800589/2020
- Decision date
- 27 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Little REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Parry
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, hearing the case by telephone before Employment Judge Little on 24 August 2020, found that Mr A Parry had suffered an unauthorised deduction from his wages in the amount of £950.87. The respondent, City of Leeds Trampolining Club Limited, did not attend or appear.
In addition to the wage deduction award, the tribunal made a preparation time order of £120. That sum was awarded for the additional time Mr Parry spent preparing his case because of the respondent's unreasonable conduct of its defence. The judgment records that £120 was not the full amount sought, which was £400.
The total sum ordered to be paid forthwith was £1,070.87, comprising the wage deduction award and the preparation time order.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal also made a preparation time order of £120 in respect of the additional time spent preparing the case because of the respondent's unreasonable conduct of its defence. The judgment says this was not the whole amount sought, which was £400. | Upheld | — | £951 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,071
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.