Case 1800605/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Sedgwick v Harvard Technology Ltd (In Administration) — 2019
- Case reference
- 1800605/2019
- Decision date
- 11 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lancaster Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal upheld the Claimant's claim for a protective award against Harvard Technology Ltd (in administration). It ordered the Respondent to pay remuneration for a protected period of 90 days beginning on 10 December 2018.
The judgment also recorded that the Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefit) Regulations 1996, regulations 6, 7 and 8, applied to the award. It noted that any award would be postponed pending service of a recoupment notice by the Secretary of State in respect of relevant benefits received by the Claimant in the prescribed period, and only the balance would then be payable directly to the Claimant.
The extracted text does not state a monetary figure for the award, and it does not record any other claims or remedies.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal described this as a claim for a protective award. The extracted text does not give a monetary figure for the award; it orders remuneration for a protected period of 90 days beginning on 10 December 2018. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.