Case 1800613/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms F Mansur v The Board of Governors of Iqra Community Primary School — 2019
- Case reference
- 1800613/2019
- Decision date
- 8 April 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Buckley REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms F Mansur
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dismissed the unfair dismissal claim because it was presented out of time and the tribunal found that it was reasonably practicable to present it in time. It also dismissed the sex discrimination claim because it was out of time and it was not just and equitable to hear it.
The claim for detriment on the ground of making protected disclosures succeeded. The tribunal found that the claimant had been subjected to detriments because she had made one or more protected disclosures, including being asked to attend two meetings in July 2017 where it was insinuated that she was responsible for an anonymous disclosure and told that if something happened the respondent would hold her responsible.
The tribunal also found detriments in the respondent's later treatment of the claimant: formal disciplinary action in September 2017 arising out of an incident on 27 September 2017, a level 2 written warning in December 2017 for the same incident, disciplinary proceedings commenced in February 2018 and concluding in June 2018, delay in responding to her subject access request in October 2018, and Mr Parwaiz Bashir's refusal to reconsider the dismissal decision by letter dated 17 December 2018. No monetary remedy is recorded in the written judgment extracted here, which notes that reasons were given orally.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed because the claim was presented out of time and it was reasonably practicable to present it in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | Dismissed because the claim was presented out of time and it was not just and equitable to hear the claim. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Whistleblowing | The tribunal upheld the claim for detriment on the ground of making protected disclosures and identified six detriments between July 2017 and December 2018. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.