Case 1800641/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Porte v Homebase Rooms Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1800641/2020
- Decision date
- 26 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brain REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Porte
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a telephone hearing on 7 August 2020 before Employment Judge Brain, the tribunal recorded that, by consent, Homebase Rooms Limited would pay Mr Porte £629.30 as damages for wrongful dismissal. The judgment states that the dismissal was without notice.
The tribunal also found that Mr Porte had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and that the respondent had a liability to make a statutory redundancy payment. It ordered payment of £629.30, described as the balance of the statutory redundancy payment due to him. The total payable under the judgment was £1,258.60, to be paid on or before 28 August 2020.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wrongful dismissal | By consent. The extracted judgment text states the respondent dismissed the claimant on 13 October 2020 without notice, which appears inconsistent with the judgment date in the extracted text. | Settled | — | £629 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and that the respondent was liable to pay the balance of the statutory redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | £629 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,259
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.