Case 1800653/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms M Silverwood v Stephen Myers t/a S Myers Fishmongers — 2021
- Case reference
- 1800653/2021
- Decision date
- 30 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Maidment Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms M Silverwood
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Leeds on 30 March 2021, Employment Judge Maidment heard Ms M Silverwood's claim against Stephen Myers t/a S Myers Fishmongers and gave oral reasons at the hearing. The tribunal found that Ms Silverwood had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and held that she was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment of £9,275.90. The judgment recorded that £5,200 of that sum had already been paid by the respondent.
The tribunal also found that Ms Silverwood had been dismissed in breach of contract and awarded her damages for notice pay in the gross sum of £3,226.40. No discrimination, whistleblowing, or other statutory claims are recorded in the judgment text supplied, and no separate remedy breakdown beyond the two monetary awards is stated.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal awarded a statutory redundancy payment of £9,275.90 and recorded that £5,200 of that sum had already been paid by the respondent. | Upheld | — | £9,276 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal awarded damages for notice pay in the gross sum of £3,226.40. | Upheld | — | £3,226 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £12,502
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.