Case 1800660/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D MacDougall v One Managed Service Ltd Introduction/ — 2024
- Case reference
- 1800660/2024
- Decision date
- 11 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D MacDougall
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was sent to the respondent's registered office on 13 March 2024. No response was presented by the return date or at all, and there was no application for an extension of time. Employment Judge JM Wade recorded that there was sufficient information on the file to give judgment under Rule 21.
The claimant's unlawful deductions from wages complaint succeeded, and the respondent was ordered to pay the gross sum of £3,854. The claimant's breach of contract complaint, which related to expenses, also succeeded, with damages of £829.07 awarded.
The total payable by the respondent was £4,683.07. The hearing listed for 14 June 2024 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment; respondent did not present a response or seek an extension of time. | Upheld | — | £3,854 |
| Breach of contract | Breach of contract complaint was limited to expenses and succeeded under Rule 21. | Upheld | — | £829 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,683
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.