Case 1800667/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Wroe v Federal Mogul Bradford Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1800667/2020
- Decision date
- 9 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lancaster Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Wroe
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe only claim identified in the judgment was unfair dismissal. After a preliminary hearing on 29 April 2020, the claimant was ordered to pay a deposit of £25.00, and the order was sent on 30 April 2020. The judgment records that the claimant failed to pay the deposit.
Because the deposit was not paid, the tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal complaint under rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. No substantive findings on liability were made, and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal complaint because the claimant had been ordered to pay a £25.00 deposit after a preliminary hearing on 29 April 2020, the order was sent on 30 April 2020, and the claimant failed to pay it. The judgment states the claim was struck out under rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.