Case 1800687/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Siswick v Kirklees Council (Adult Social Care) — 2019
- Case reference
- 1800687/2019
- Decision date
- 19 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Siswick
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis is a one-page withdrawal judgment in case 1800687/2019, Ms S Siswick v Kirklees Council, dated 19 August 2019. The tribunal recorded that the proceedings were dismissed after the claimant withdrew the claim. The extracted text does not record any findings on the merits of the dispute.
No monetary award was made. The judgment does not identify any remedy calculation, and it contains no substantive discussion of liability beyond the dismissal following withdrawal. The decision is signed by Employment Judge D N Jones.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The extracted judgment text does not specify the underlying complaint type; this classification is taken from the case context listing supplied with the file. The proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The extracted judgment text does not specify the underlying complaint type; this classification is taken from the case context listing supplied with the file. The proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.