Case 1800726/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Clark v Ewen Precision Engineering Ltd Heard: via CVP — 2021
- Case reference
- 1800726/2021
- Decision date
- 10 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Eeley
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Clark
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Eeley, sitting alone via CVP on 4 June 2021, upheld the claimant's claims for unfair dismissal, wrongful dismissal, and breach of contract in respect of accrued but untaken holiday pay. The judgment also records that the claimant's application for costs was refused.
The tribunal awarded £39,336.32 in total. That sum comprised notice pay of £16,463.86, a basic award/redundancy payment of £13,988, a compensatory award of £4,411.26 described as one month's salary and pension contribution plus loss of statutory rights, and holiday pay of £4,473.20.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records a basic award/redundancy payment of £13,988 and a compensatory award of £4,411.26 for this claim. | Upheld | — | £18,399 |
| Wrongful dismissal | Awarded as notice pay. | Upheld | — | £16,464 |
| Breach of contract | Brought in respect of accrued but untaken holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £4,473 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £39,336
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £13,988
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £4,411
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.