Case 1800752/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs L Longbottom v Thornhill Lees Community Association Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1800752/2019
- Decision date
- 27 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shulman REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs L Longbottom
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr C Longbottom and Mrs L Longbottom were employed by Thornhill Lees Community Association Limited until 18 October 2018. They sought notice pay, holiday pay and redundancy payments. The tribunal heard evidence from both claimants and from Kamran Asif and Gulfam Asif, and preferred Kamran's evidence where there was conflict.
On the evidence, Kamran Asif, who was the sole trustee at the relevant time, did not have any redundancy discussions with the claimants and took no steps to make them redundant or dismiss them. The tribunal found that on or about 15 October 2018 Mrs Longbottom told Kamran that the association had run out of money and that the claimants were leaving on 18 October 2018. It did not accept the claimants' account that Kamran agreed redundancies or authorised dismissal letters, and it found that he had no knowledge of the alleged letters or dismissal until after the 30 November 2018 letter.
The notice pay and holiday pay claims were dismissed as out of time. The tribunal held that it was reasonably practicable to present them in time, noting that Mrs Longbottom had spoken to ACAS in November 2018 and again in January 2019 and had also corresponded with the respondent, so her stress and anxiety did not prevent action being taken. Time was therefore not extended for either claim.
The redundancy payment claim was dismissed on the merits. The tribunal found that no redundancy process had been initiated, no redundancy letters were authorised or signed by Kamran, and the claimants were not dismissed for redundancy or otherwise. Although their roles were later absorbed by trustees, that did not alter the tribunal's finding that the claim for redundancy payments failed.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Notice pay claim; dismissed because the tribunal held it was out of time and that it was reasonably practicable to present it in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Holiday pay claim; dismissed because it was out of time and time was not extended. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | Dismissed after the tribunal preferred Kamran Asif's evidence and found no redundancy procedure, no authorisation or signing of dismissal letters, and no dismissal for redundancy or otherwise. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
6 references- s.111(2)(b) ERA 1996
- Dedman v British Building and Engineering Appliances Limited [1974] ICR 53
- Palmer and anor v Southend on Sea Borough Council [1984] ICR 372
- Article 7(c) Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994
- s.95(1) ERA 1996
- reasonably practicable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.