Case 1800754/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Hargreaves v Tesco Stores Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1800754/2021
- Decision date
- 11 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cronin Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Hargreaves
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded that the claimant's wrongful dismissal claim, described as an incorrect notice payment claim, was conceded by the respondent and succeeded. The respondent was ordered to pay £148.22 gross.
The Tribunal also found the claimant's breach of contract complaint, concerning a shortfall on employer pension contributions, well founded and ordered payment of £5.93 gross. The unpaid holiday pay claim was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed, and the unauthorised deductions from wages claim was found not well founded and dismissed.
The respondent was additionally ordered to pay £23.12, described as a 15% uplift on damages and compensation for failure to comply with the ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wrongful dismissal | Claim for wrongful dismissal described as incorrect notice payment was conceded by the respondent and succeeded. | Upheld | — | £148 |
| Breach of contract | Complaint described as breach of contract for shortfall on employer's pension contributions was found well founded and succeeded. | Upheld | — | £6 |
| Holiday pay | The unpaid holiday pay claim was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The unauthorised deductions from wages claim was found not well founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £177
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.