Case 1800767/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Munkley v Pagets Builders Merchants Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 1800767/2024
- Decision date
- 30 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Maidment Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Munkley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing in Leeds by CVP on 26 September 2024, before Employment Judge Maidment, the tribunal dealt with a breach of contract claim and an unfair dismissal claim brought by Mr T Munkley against Pagets Builders Merchants Ltd. The judgment records that Mr Munkley appeared in person and the respondent was represented by counsel.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay Mr Munkley gross damages of £2,750 for breach of contract. The award was described as the amount of guaranteed bonus that would have accrued during the claimant's contractual notice period.
The unfair dismissal claim was dismissed because the claimant withdrew it. No separate unfair dismissal remedy was awarded, and the judgment does not record any other monetary components beyond the £2,750 contractual damages award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay damages of £2,750 gross, described as the amount of guaranteed bonus that would have accrued during the claimant's contractual notice period. | Upheld | — | £2,750 |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal recorded that this claim was dismissed on the claimant's withdrawal of it. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,750
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.